![]()
|
Alone and Together - Two prominent themes in the paintings of Marta Whistler |
|
"One became the symbol of the primordial One, the divine without a second, the non-polarized existence.
It comprises relation, entirety, and unity, and rests in itself, but stands behind all created existence."1
Annemarie Schimmel,
"Two is doubt, disunion, discord, dissension, hermaphrodite, The aim of this article is to analyze a selected numbers of Ms. Whistler's paintings which portray isolated individuals and objects, two individuals and objects and a number of individuals and objects. The primary criterion of the analysis is to discover symbolic meanings in paintings of individuals and inanimate objects, as well as the symbolic meanings of their numbers. Although secondary to this analysis, other pictorial factors such as form and color will be also taken into account, adding another dimension to the contrast between one, two and many. Certain obvious characteristics pertain to the portrayal of a single individual. The most prominent is the absence of all social ties and circumstances as the focus of our attention is brought to a high degree on one object. The eye of the viewer does not roam across the canvas. Everything is presented as here and now, and it is usually the face and form of the figure which provide some clues about the mood and other psychological indications of the person depicted. The non-polarized human existence may indicate loneliness, a state of alienation from the rest of humanity or an inability to bridge the yawning gap between himself/herself and others. The presentation of two individuals implies a completely different set of circumstances. The original unity of a single individual portrayed is broken up and now, as a viewer, one is faced with a division, which in itself implies a relationship with all its multifaceted aspects. It may be initiated by either of the two individuals depicted or by both. Number 2 has therefore both positive and negative connotations. It is a precondition for individuals of two different genders to create new life, or it also may en gender a seed of discord. In confronting a multitude of individuals or objects on a canvas, the eye of the viewer has to roam around the composition in order to realize the relationship among the items, their relationship in terms of primacy and relative importance. An object's prominence is usually indicated by its size, its foregrounding on the paintings well its centering or sidelining. The number of individuals or objects presented possesses symbolic significance. The number 3 is considered to be a sacred number which resolves the difference and tension between numbers 1 and 2, as manifested in Christian trinity and the Buddhist tri-ratna symbols. An example of a solitary tortured existence is the oil painting #117. The blue background draws the viewer into infinity which further recedes into blue nothingness. Part of the woman's chest and breast is black, indicating to the viewer that her whole body will be enveloped by blackness and that it will eventually disappear by being absorbed into the black background. On the other, hand part of her face and body is brown, the color of earth. The division between black and brown points symbolically to the contrast between potential nonbeing and existent being.
![]() Oil Painting #117
![]() Oil Painting #40
![]() Oil Painting #14
'Alone and Together' would be the most appropriate title for the painting #35. The two individuals, a male in front and a female behind, are bound to one another by a wire net. The contradictory meaning of number 2 - togetherness and separation, unity and discord - is played out in all its acute starkness. The wire which binds them is a hindrance preventing their final intimacy and protection in their unity and yet it is a curse as they can never become fully fledged and independent individuals. They seem to be suspended between becoming full individuals and their original unity as one androgynous human being. Unlike painting #14, this thwarted separation is portrayed as a tragic event. This is the negative aspect of number 2 and duality. In addition to the inner predicament of the couple there I s also present an outer one which they will have to face. The red posts supporting the wire in which they are enmeshed separates them from the outer world where all kinds of tribulations are in store for them. These modern Adam and Eve have eaten from the tree of knowledge and now they are prisoners of life with old age, sickness and death. Just as the flower on their right is already inclining and will wither and die, so they will too.
![]() Oil Painting #35
Des Menschen Seele, Wie der Mensch aus Getem Und B'sen ist gemischt, so ist die Fhnfe Die erste Zahl aus Grad und Ungerade
Five is There are five individuals in painting #38. "As an indivisible combination of the masculine 3 and the feminine 2, 5 appears, for pure mathematical reasons, to be a fitting number to express the union of male and female."4 The symbolism of the number 5 dominates the painting. In addition to the 5 individuals, 4 women and 1 man, there are 5 red rays, with the one on the extreme left bifurcating while the white creature in the upper right hand corner has 5 spurs issuing from her body. The focus of the painting is the male figure in the center and his carefree, triumphant and assertive gesture of raised arms. The woman standing in the background with her head framed by the man's outstretched arm is a secondary figure. Each individual in the painting appears to be riding - or carried by - his or her own ray of light originating in the blue infinity of space.
![]() Oil Painting #38
Unlike the previous paintings discussed where the central figures in the foreground are men in painting #11 we find the reverse to be true. The women occupy the foreground and are confronting the viewer 'en face' while the men are depicted behind them with three quarters of their faces visible. The scene is domestic and casual; glasses and plates of food on the table suggest togetherness and conviviality. The men seem, to be hiding behind the women's backs. Did somebody barge in unannounced and the men are trying to hide? Are they ashamed of being found in this delicate and compromising situation? Let the viewer decide. The threatening cat on the mantelpiece prosides over the gathering. In some traditions cats are associated with sin, and this association may be pertinent to the scene presented on this painting.
![]() Oil Painting #11
The first impression of painting #09 is one of order and symmetry. The viewer perceives a group of inanimate objects on a red background presided over by a pale greenish sphere. There are triangles, rectangles, and pointed linear sticks placed horizontally, and a combination of different objects with a bulge at one end placed both vertically and horizontally. What does the painter have in mind? Is this just a random collection of different objects or do the objects have symbolic meanings? In other paintings of Marta Whistler such as #11, the human genitalia are freely depicted, but there are other ways they could be presented by employing symbols. Asking a painter about his/her intention and motivation for employing symbols would be useless, because an artist does not deliberate about them. Symbols proceed from the artist's unconsciousness and in that way they are similar to dreams. Here we may use Freud's interpretation of dreams as a heuristic device in deciphering Whistler's painting #09. To quote Frued: "...All elongated objects, such as sticks, tree-trunks and umbrellas (the opening of these last being comparable to an erection) may stand for the organ ... as well as all long sharp weapons, such as knives, daggers, and pikes... Boxes, cases, chests, cupboards, and ovens, represent the uterus..."5 Freud's contention is that such symbols transcend dreams and they appear in myths, folk tales and pictorial representations. Assuming the validity of Freud's theory, Whistler's painting ceases to be a riddle and lends itself to an easy if not entirely convincing interpretation. A blue triangle pointed downward is a symbol of a female sexual organ, and the same could be said about the triangles pointing sideways. "Point uppermost triangles stand for fire and the male sexual organ; point downwards, for water and the female sexual organs."6 Triangles are intimately connected with the number 3; the three triangles pointing sideways parallel the three sticks located below which, according to Freud, stand for male genitals. The four rectangular boxes to the left, following Freud's symbolic explanation, stand for female genitalia and occur in the same number as the blue triangles. The arcane construction denotes male genitalia somewhat more descriptively and realistically than the sticks below. The stick with a bulge in it pointing toward the triangles indicates potential penetration, although it is difficult to know whether the horizontal projection is situated in the three dimensional space. It should be kept in mind that the Freudian symbolic interpretation of visual signs is based on dream symbolism which Freud claims to be similar to the unconscious origin of artistic creativity. The general objection raised against the Freudian theory of reductionism to the sexual drive applies here, too. The human mind is too complex to be limited to the sexual drive alone. There are different ways of seeing the interpreting this painting, as Campbell demonstrates.7 One may also conclude that painting #09 is just a juxtaposition of color and form, and that the whole meaning of the painting resides in them and nothing else.
![]() Oil Painting #09
The construction on the left side of painting has five parts. It is a synthesis and reconciliation of the complementary opposition of sticks, rectangles and triangles, with even numbers signifying a womb and odd numbers related to male genitalia. This synthesis is based on the five parts divided into four and one, resulting in androgyny. The sphere presiding over the scene (the moon or the sun) is hierarchically the supreme object of all those presented in the painting. It is considered to be a sign of the original unity of the heavens. Its relation to the rectangles represents a transition from heavens to earth. Jung considered the symbol of the circle to be an archetypal image of the totality of the psyche, a symbol of the ego, while the square to be the symbol of the terrestrial matter of the body and of reality.9 Thus, all other objects are contained and issue from the sphere. The supremacy of the sphere is shown by its height and size in relation to other objects in the painting. It should be mentioned that the Freudian interpretation of the painting would be accessible only to those who are familiar with is code; otherwise the painting would safely pass the strictest puritanically fundamentalist scrutiny.
1Annemarie Schimmel, The Mystery of Numbers, Oxford University Press, 1993, p.42. 2Quoted in Annemarie Schimmel, The Mystery of Numbers, p.46. 3Friedrich Schiller, Die Piccolomini, G.P. Putnamfs Sons, 1888, p.32, II.1(edited by James Morgan Hart) In Christian art number five is symbolic of man, the four limbs of the body with the head controlling them, see Gertrude Grace Sill, A Handbook of Symbols in Christian Art, Touchstone Book, 1975, p.137. 4Annemarie Schimmel, The Mystery of Numbers, p.106. 5Sigmund Freud, The Interpretation of Dreams, Avon Books, 1965, p.391 (translated from German by James Strachey). In Christian art number five is symbolic of man, the four limbs of the body with the head controlling them, see Gertrude Grace Sill, A Handbook of Symbols in Christian Art, Touchstone Book, 1975, p.137. 6Jean Chevalier and Alain Gherbrant, The Penguin Dictionary of Symbols, Penguin Books, 1996, p.1034. (Translated by John Buchanan-Brown). This triangle symbolism was prevalent in India, Greece, and Rome. An indirect confirmation of their symbolism in Ms. Whistlerfs pictorial art is the blue color which she uses in painting female genitals in her other paintings. 7Addressed to Ms. Whistler: gYou seem to have the most arcane manifestations of mathematical expression, exemplified by your #9 oil. As a case in point, one need only to consider the profoundly incommensurable relationship between curves and lines which have so puzzled and enthralled the greatest of philosophers and mathematicians from the ancient Pythagoreans to definitive modernists beginning with Galileo, Descartes, Leibnitz, and Newton.h Private correspondence from professor Stephen (Sen) Campbell, University of California at Irvine. 8Jean Chevalier and Alain Gherbrant, The Penguin Dictionary of Symbols, p,995. 9Carl Jung, Man and His Symbols, London, 1964, p.249.
|